🔗 Share this article

Tbecame clear he could survive defeat by lower-league opposition. He weathered a decisive European final against a particularly poor Spurs sides for many years. He could survive losing at home against West Ham and Wolves, a lowly league position, the tactical inflexibility, undermining the team's most promising homegrown talent, the 32% win rate, labeling his team the worst in Manchester United history. Yet, there existed one adversary against whom Ruben Amorim was not permitted to dance. If you challenge the sporting director, you had better succeed.

Unfortunately, like many a top-flight right-back during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning campaign, Amorim took on the executive and seems to have missed. Even the most distracted of readers can see the irony here: a manager who frequently berated his squad for losing individual battles crumbling when confronted by the white heat and formidable presence of a the Premier League’s most intimidating football executives.

In truth, this whole painful saga seems to paint the director in a different perspective. It may have been easy, based on his brief stint in a similar role at Southampton, to regard him as little more than a functionary in the United exoskeleton: a man whose appointment was due largely to his friendship with his former boss a fellow executive rather than any verifiable talent. How mistaken everyone was. In brilliantly outmanoeuvring the club's celebrated head coach, as he outmanoeuvred the hapless a previous executive before him, Jason Wilcox has demonstrated to be among football's true generals: a strategic mind of which the club's mid-table rivals will now be rightly wary.

The Tactical Clash Over System & Philosophy

To illustrate, it was the director who having been part of the hierarchy that appointed the rigid 3-4-3 advocate Amorim originally, was instrumental in trying to persuade him to abandon his beloved formation. Unsurprisingly, these pleas were resisted. However, these judgements hold greater authority when issued from the mouth with the impeccable soccer background he possesses, holder of three England caps and a contributor to a title-winning side from 31 years ago.

Perhaps in time Jason Wilcox may be persuaded to outline his thought processes to the rest of us. Maybe one day he might be asked why Amorim is departing with a full payout, without any compensation reduction clause in place. But Jason Wilcox speaks rarely in public, for excellent reasons. The true intellectuals of this sport – men like Jason Wilcox – function at a level beyond our own prosaic understanding. If he ever did speak, probably we would perceive would be ultrasonic blips and four-dimensional whirring. Desiring an explanation is not equivalent to being prepared to receive.

The Supreme Power In the Throne

Naturally, by focusing our attention on the sporting director we overlook the true genius behind the club's current leadership. The director is, in reality, merely executing the directives of his ultimate line manager Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who privately has emphasized his desire for a back four. It is reported, Ratcliffe has also suggested playing Bryan Mbeumo as a right wing-back. The owner is eager for the club to adopt data science and metrics. Per reports, during a leadership summit early in his investment, he announced that United’s style of play “shall be decided by this group”.

After all, Ratcliffe is an expert in this technical footballing stuff, drawing from his previous experience in industry and yachting. Most importantly he remains immensely wealthy, and as we all know, the rich are superior: more insightful, more wise, more tactically astute, fundamentally superior. Who else would you trust to oversee a strategic plan of cost-cutting, the building of a modern arena that appears similar to an abstract design, the signing of a new striker?

The New Soccer Order: Directors Over Coaches

This is a trend we are increasingly seeing at the elite levels football. Historically, teams mistakenly delegated major sporting choices to subordinate staff like managers, talent spotters – even footballers. Maybe previously possible for an up-and-coming, innovative manager with a philosophy and drive to join a club and see their vision supported to fruition. Yet how many businesses have these guys set up? How many mass redundancies have they overseen? Far preferable to place genuine authority where it rightly belongs: the executive class, the casually dressed executives, the individuals with the jaw-dropping professional resumes. It is wiser to determine the strategy in the boardroom and hire a coach who will adapt their methods to suit. If coaches were formerly chefs, they have become more like delivery personnel: not really responsible for the food, yet ultimately answerable should it be delivered poorly or fails to meet standards.

In the meantime, a coach's role is increasingly less about defining the vision and more about selling it: the receptionist of the operation, the public face of an organisation they can do little to influence. Enzo Maresca leads a team of literal children into the Champions League and secures two medium-sized trophies, and effectively is dismissed for talking. Wilfried Nancy finds his standing damaged while those individuals who hired him continue to make errors indefinitely.

The Modern Corporate Game: Accountability Only for the Coaches

And possibly in a small way this represents corporate governance at work: the rise of a privileged elite who can never be wrong, whose choices are always untouchable, whose mistakes can invariably be resolved by sacking without justification. Appoint the system coach only to fire him for playing too much 3-4-3. Bring in the project manager and then bin them for taking excessive time. And most importantly show gratitude; for the incremental increases in ticket costs, for your new player acquisitions, for the fact that the adults – however well qualified – are in charge.